Google
 

2009-07-03

US Tank Battles in Germany 1944-45


The US campaign in Germany began sooner than anticipated in mid-September 1944. With the decimation of the German army in the west in a sequence of summer encirclement battles at Falaise, the Seine river, and finally the Mons pocket in Belgium, the Wehrmacht was in headlong retreat. In the 1930s, Germany had erected a series of fortified defenses along the Westwall, better known as the Siegfried line. However, not expecting to need them so soon, many of the pillboxes and other fortifications were unmanned or had no armament. As a result, when the US 3rd Armored Division suddenly appeared on the German frontier near Aachen in mid-September, the Siegfried line proved to be a hollow defense. The US 5th Armored Division also made a penetration further south, on the approaches of Bitburg through the forested Eifel region. Although the US Army made a narrow penetration of the Siegfried line near Aachen. Allied attention was focused elsewhere. Priority in September was given to Operation Market Garden, the British plan to seize the Rhine river bridge at Arnhem by airborne assault. The failure at Arnhem was critical for Allied plans since it distracted the British 21st Army Group from clearing the Scheldt estuary leading into the harbor at Antwerp. Without a functioning port at Antwerp, Allied forces in the Low Countries were critically short of supplies. German forces had wrecked the port facilities at Cherbourg and in the Breton ports, and the ports at Normandy were not sufficient to supply the Allied armies for offensive operations. Until the approaches to Antwerp were cleared in late November, the pace of Allied operations along the German frontier were restricted by inadequate supplies.

Tank Power 07 - PzKpfw.V Panther Vol.7


Just as the first series-produced variant of the Panther tank was introduced, various concepts were filed as to how the whole hull or sections of it can be utilized for new self-propelled anti-aircraft guns. In September 1942 a VFW (Versuchsflakwagen) project has originated, based upon the Panther Ausf.D. Another project, also based on Panther Ausf.D was the Gerat 42, that the complete design drawings were made for, reported ready on November 4, 1942. The overall front situation and the urgent need for greater numbers of modem tanks made the Chief Inspector for Armored Troops, as well as "In 6" forbid any more anti-aircraft vehicles based on Panther tanks. Only PzKpfw III and PzKpfw IV chassis were to be used for such purposes. The final ban on Panther-based SPA AGs came on January 23, 1945, when Munitions Minister, Albert Speer, implemented the so-called Notprogramm der Riistungsendfer-tigung, or Emergency Munitions Program. The EMP replaced the up until then binding Siegesprogramm (Victory Program), introduced in July, 1944. No Flakpanzers based upon Panther were provided for in the EMP. Before the final ban, several other Panther-based SPAAG projects were being created.

Nuts & Bolts Vol.10 - Hummel Sd.Kfz.165


Germany's first attempt at self-propelled Artillery on a tracked chassis was the conversion of the PzKfw I Ausf. B to carry the 15 cm sIG 33 Infantry gun after the experiences of the Polish war 1939. Its development was ordered by the Waffenamt and was produced through Alkett. However, this was primary an aid to the infantry and the few vehicles deployed were issued to the infantry regiments within the Panzer Divisions. It would not he long before the Panzer Divisions were also calling for a self-propelled artillery vehicle to assist in suppression of enemy fire. The early war successes of the Blitzkrieg tactics produced their own problems for the ground forces of Germany, especially for the "Schnelle Truppen" (Fast Troops). One of these was the inadequacies of the motarised artillery to keep pace with the Panzers. The normal means of artillery movement with the Panzer- and Motorised Divisions was by Prime Mover. Germany prior to her entry in W.W.II had developed an excellent range of these vehicles (half-tracks). They varied from the tiny Sd.Kfz.10 (1 tonne) to the massive Sd.Kfz.9 (18 tonne).

Marine-Arsenal - Die Schweren Kreuzer der ADMIRAL HIPPER-Klasse


Der "Schwere Kreuzer" ist als Kriegsschifftyp nicht sozusagen "organisch gewachsen", sondern entstand durch einen "Kunstgriff": Nachdem bald nach dem Beginn des neuen Jahrhunderts der bisherige "Panzerkreuzer" im "Schlachtkreuzer" seine Fortsetzung fand, wurden keine Kreuzer mit einem stärkeren Geschützkaliber als 15,2cm in Auftrag gegeben. Dies war nicht auf etwaige internationale Abmachungen zurückzuführen, sondern hatte sich quasi von selbst so eingespielt: Mit Rücksicht auf den Gewichtsbedarf der für Kreuzergeschwindigkeit ausgelegten Maschinenanlagen und des nicht verzichtbaren leichten Panzerschutzes ließ sich ein stärkeres Geschützkaliber nicht unterbringen, wenn nicht eine wesentliche Erhöhung des Deplacements in Kauf genommen wurde. Dies aber wollte ernsthaft keine Marine. Allgemein herrschte darüber Übereinstimmung, daß das 15,2-cm-Kaliber (in Deutschland stets 15 cm) für Kreuzer ausreichend ist.

M48 Patton in Action


During World War II the US Army had worked on a number of designs to supplement the Sherman, but through a lack of foresight and philosophical stupidity these new designs were not pushed along until the latter part of 1944, when the battlefield situation in Europe was desperate for a more heavily armed and armored tank to counter the increasing number of German Panther and Tiger tanks being encountered. As a result of this the new M26 General Pershing heavy tank was rushed to Europe in the closing months of the European conflict to aid the outclassed Sherman. With its 90mm gun and well designed ballistic shape the Pershing acquitted Itself well in the few contacts it had with German armor before the war ended. Following the Nazi surrender In Europe, US Army officials were able to examine in detail the latest strides in German tank development. In addition, these same officers saw the latest Soviet armor, most of which totally outgunned current allied tanks. But while these discoveries prompted concern, the sudden appearance of the atomic bomb in August of 1945 caused this concern to diminish, since most ranking officials, both political and military, saw the beginning of a new era in warfare. Most American political and military leaders felt that conventionally equipped armed forces were a thing of the past. With the surrender of Japan, the United States rapidly began to demobilize the huge military machine created to defeat the Axis powers. Little thought was given toward modernizing those forces that were to remain, except for the Air Force, which, with its new atomic strategic deterrent weapons, was now considered to be the main battle force.

M41 Walker Bulldog in Action


During the early days of the Second World War. the basic American light tank was either the M3 or M5 Stuart. Although mechanically sound and a robust performer, the Stuart's light armor and armament severely restricted its employment on the battlefield. Constant requests from field commanders for a better armed and armored vehicle eventually resulted in the introduction of the M24 Chaffee during 1944. With its lightweight, hard hitting 75mm cannon, better armor protection, mechanical reliability and speed, the M24 was probably the finest light tank to see service during the war. At the end of the Second World War the M24 was the main light tank in service with U.S. armor formations. Although some older model Stuarts were retained for training or to equip Reserve and National Guard formations, most M3/M5s were either scrapped or supplied to various allied forces to rebuild their armored units. Following the war, armchair strategists came to the conclusion that the atomic bomb had made conventional weapons obsolete. Despite such ridiculous theories, which led to massive cuts in conventional defense appropriations, the Army conducted a series of studies on the war to accumulate information and reach some consensus of thought regarding future tactics and weapons employment.

Kagero Topshots 34 - Dodge WC51


Production of the Dodge WC51 commenced in 1942 in response to the needs of the U.S. Army for a multi-role, four-wheel-drive vehicle. Its full designation was Dodge T214-WC51 ton 4x4 and its popular name was 'Beep', which originated from 'Big Jeep'. The vehicle was used for carrying troops and towing artillery pieces. In the period between 1942-1945, along with the model WC52 (which differed externally from the WC51 by a winch mounted on the front bumper) as many as 34,000 vehicles of this type were ultimately produced. The Dodge T214 chassis, common to both models, was also used to produce other specialized vehicles, such as the WC53 Carryall featuring a fixed metal cab; the WC 54 ambulance; the WC55 self-propelled antitank weapons carrier armed with a 37 mm cannon; the WC57 and WC58 staff cars, and the WC59 and WC61 telephone line-laying vehicles. From 1943, the Chrysler Corporation used the Dodge T214 model as a basis for production of the 1.5 ton, three-axle Dodge T223 trucks, designated WC62 and WC63, which incorporated a 6x6 all-wheel drive system.

British and American Tanks of WWII


In Britain prior to 1936 the Master General of the Ordnance was the supreme authority responsible for tank design and procurement. Under him the Director of Mechanisation supervised actual design work in conjunction with the Mechanisation Board, which was a committee made up of senior representatives of the "user" arms. By the outbreak of war in 1939, the Master General of the Ordnance had become the Director General of Munitions Production and all designs and procurement responsibilities were transferred from the War Office to the newly-established Ministry of Supply. Overall tank design responsibility then came under the Director-General of Tanks and Transport with, in 1940, a Controller of Mechanisation supervising the Director of Mechanisation, who worked with the Mechanisation Board as before. In May 1940, following British reverses in the French campaign, a new War Cabinet was formed under Winston Churchill, who approved the setting up of a Tank Board to examine faults in the existing design and procurement system and to advise on improvements. They proposed a Director of Armoured Fighting Vehicles (DAFV) to represent the War Office (General Stall) interest, with separate Directors of Design and Production, all under the Director-General of Tanks and Transport, who took the place of the old Director of Mechanisation.

Armored Trains of the Soviet Union 1917-45


In very many cases history is downright curious. For example, historian Dimitri Volkoganov related that in 1921 Josef Stalin was highly indignant at then chairman of the Revolutionary War Council Trotsky, the supreme military commander. During his frequent trips to visit the fighting troops Trotsky not only surrounded himself with a large party of young, leather-clad Red Army soldiers, but also frequently had two armored trains accompany him. Stalin, who in any case envied Trotsky because of his talent as a speaker, his energy and his popularity, viewed this as a challenge. At that time he had no way of knowing that he - who could not stand flying -would make use of eight armored trains of the NKVD while travelling by rail to the Potsdam Conference in July 1945 (1923 km: USSR 1095 km, Poland 594 km, Germany 234 km). For completeness sake, it should be added that there were six to fifteen sentries per kilometer of track. All told, the NKVD employed eleven regiments with 17,000 men as well as 1,515 men of its strategic personnel to guard the route. As to whether Stalin had a special personal relationship with these steel colossi on rails or whether the idea of guarding the route from Moscow to Potsdam originated from his entourage, the question remains open. As a matter of fact, one can say that this episode also marked the end of this class of weapon. The Soviets released little information concerning the command structures, organization, allocation of personnel and equipment, losses, total strength, the fate of the trains themselves or other details. After the war there were few clues as to whether plans existed in the USSR to continue using armored trains or other armored rail vehicles.

Battleship Sharnhorst


In the beginning, there is a staff requirement containing all the components of the desired warship: size, armament, armour, speed and endurance. These are based on tactical considerations such as mission of the ship, her ability to overcome opponents and the ability to evade a superior adversary. These operational considerations are forwarded to the design office, where the first sketch designs are drafted. These designs are then submitted to other departments until a consensus is achieved. The result of this is a draft which shows the appearance, the compartments, and the arrangement of the armament and armour. This includes weight calculations, so that it is then possible to make detailed calculations and develop them for working design. Marine-Oberbaurat Blechschmidt were responsible for the development of Scharnhorst. The single criteria for the development and construction of a warship is summed up as battleworthiness. This is the sum of all built-in features, such as combat power, speed and manoeuverability, along with the training of the crew and leadership. In other words, it is the sum of weights of the ship's hull, machinery, armament, armour and other equipment combined with the other factors that cannot be precisely calculated.

Allied Coastal Forces of World War II Vol.1


This book is concerned principally with the well known wooden warships lhat stemmed from the Fairmile Marine Company of Cobham, Surrey. To the best of my knowledge the idea of mass-producing wooden minor warships in time of war was the unique idea of one man, Fairmile's founder. Each type was designed and built in kit form, to be assembled at a multitude of small shipyards both at home and abroad, while at the same time freeing the few specialist producers such as Vosper, White and the British Power Boat Co to continue the construction of more specialist high-speed craft. The Fairmile designs also used basic materials, and relied on many new, non-naval industries to provide materials without interfering in the How of products from those specialist manufacturers. During World War I, the increasing success of German submarine attacks on shipping by torpedo, and an increase of minelaying in home waters, forced the Royal Navy to seek a method of combating this threat. It led to a demand for large numbers of anti-submarine motor launches to reduce the threat of coastal attacks. With British industry fully committed, there was no additional production available, and the required numbers could not be found from home sources.

Model Graphix 09 2008


Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008 Model Graphix 09 2008

Labels

Armour (649) Aviation (1922) History (1804) Modelling (509) Uniform (73) Warship (334)